Deopham History

Court of the Manor of Shadwells otherwise Cockerells October 1851

Contents

  1. Heading
  2. Homage
  3. Property
  4. Defaulters
  5. The Disentailing Deed
    1. Summary
    2. The Deed
    3. Outcome
  6. Navigation

Heading

TitleThe Manor of Shadwell’s otherwise Cockerell’s in Morley: The General Court Baron of Thomas Sutton, Gentleman, Lord of the Manor
DateOctober 20th 1851
StewardWilliam Massey, Gentleman, Steward
LocationIn & for this Manor
Page numbers in Court Roll171 – 183

Homage

Archibald Rowing
Charles Clarke

Property

Person surrendering propertyProclamationsDate of the CopyholdBeneficiaryAttorneyIdentification of propertyRentFine
George Custance Leak Knight of Wymondham, Gentleman, and George Browne Leak Knight of Framingham Earl, Esquire request disentailing deed recorded in Indenture dated December 17th 1847 to be enrolled in the Court Roll.Candell Clarke, Gentleman
John Curson (deceased)1st Proclamation
George Hubbard (deceased)1st Proclamation:
June 20th 1848
2nd Proclamation
William Kemp (deceased)1st ProclamationLate free tenant of this Manor
Edward Lebbel (deceased)1st ProclamationLate free tenant of this Manor

Defaulters

Those tenants of this Manor who have made default in doing their suits & services at this Court are amerced 3d each.

The Disentailing Deed

Summary

George Custance Leak Knight had inherited property from John Browne which had an Estate tail attached to it meaning that he could only pass the property on to his male heirs, or failing that to other mail descendents of John Browne. The purpose of the disentailing is to remove this encumbrance from the property so that it is free to be sold – sold to William Robert Clarke in this case.

The full text of John Browne’s will (referred to in the Indenture below) can be seen here.

The Deed

This is the Disentailing Deed as copied into the Court Roll:

Outcome

Although this Deed was accepted and entered into the Court Roll, the record of the Court Roll dated November 9th 1861 shows that because it had not been enrolled within six months it was not considered legal. The process therefore had to be repeated (for all of the Manors in which Copyhold property was held) with a new Disentailing Deed which was enrolled at the Court of November 9th 1861.

DateChange
1/1/25Comment on outcome
30/12/24Published IMG_20241210_110435