Church Farm – Proposed New Buildings

Contents

1. Specification of the Buildings Proposed
   1. Plan 1 referred to in the specifications
2. Outcome of the Proposal
3. Navigation

Specification of the Buildings Proposed

Document courtesy of Lambeth Palace Library

Plan 1 referred to in the specifications

The blue represents buildings, posts, rails etc which it was intended to remove. These run right up to the edge of the road here marked as Hackford Road – later known as Church Road.

Image courtesy of Lambeth Palace Library

Outcome of the Proposal

The final paragraph of the above specification drawn up in 1861 reads:

We the undersigned James Loorth, bricklayer, and James Clements, Carpenter, having examined the within written specification and description and the plans delivered therewith undertake and agree to execute the works mentioned therein, in all respects in a sound workmanlike manner, to the satisfaction of the said Ecclesiastical Commissioners or their lessees for the sum of £266:10:0.

On June 9th 1836 Charles Millard explained the problem to the Commissioners:

[We] have to inform you that some of the farming buildings, originally of a very inferior description, have been repaired from time to time, ’till they will scarcely bear it any longer, and we suggest, subject to your approval, that they be pulled down and replaced with more substantial ones.
The walls of the buildings in question are principally clay, the roofs being in part tiled and in part thatched; the new buildings we propose should have clay lump walls, all the roofs being tiled.

The plans and specifications were submitted to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners who were reluctant to contribute towards the cost. In response to this negative reply, Messrs C.W. and J.W. Millard as executors for W.S. Millard, wrote on June 20^th 1864 “reminding” the Commissioners that:-

1. As lessees, they had contributed towards improvements in the Chancel of the Church;
2. The Commissioners should have as much interest in the farm buildings as the Church Chancel;
3. The lessees would be prepared to make a contribution exceeding the cost of making repairs to the present buildings;
4. Carrying out these works would increase the value of the property.

The meeting of the Commissioners held on June 30^th 1864 resolved not to contribute towards the cost of the building works.

Navigation

Date	Change
21/7/26	Published – IMG_20231107_163352